This Action Alert has expired and can no longer be sent. Many thanks to those who participated.

Action Alert: Tell Greenpeace to Stop Greenwashing Old-Growth Forest Logging

Greenpeace continues to espouse nonsense that logging old-growth forests is protection and can be done in an environmentally acceptable manner. Their recent case studies claim that Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification of first time industrial logging of hundreds of millions of acres of old-growth forests has “led to a substantial improvement in forest management practices.” Loss and diminishment of primary rainforests and other old-growth forests are never ecologically sustainable – and threaten local peoples, species, ecosystems, climate, and the biosphere with collapse and death. Please demand that Greenpeace and pals resign from FSC immediately, end all involvement with primary rainforest and other old-growth logging, and work exclusively for old forest protection, restoration, and small-scale local eco-forestry. We have been asking Greenpeace politely to stop helping log old-growth for the past six years (see http://bit.ly/GPlogold ) and been stonewalled and ridiculed, during which time many old forests have fallen and the fate of the biosphere become more unclear.

By Forests.org, a project of EcoInternet - July 6, 2013

Share on Facebook | | Discuss Alert | Earlier Archived Version



Additional Background

Greenpeace co-founded, has been the chairman of the board, and continues as a prominent member of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), which exists to greenwash industrial logging of hundreds of millions of acres – an area two times the size of Texas – of primary and old-growth forests. In a series of recent case studies, Greenpeace continues its greenwash of old-growth forest logging, still claiming after 20 years of FSC failure that old-growth logging can be done well, and that destroying primary forests somehow helps protect them. [1] Ecologically and evolutionarily intact old forests cover less than 20% of their original extent. Old-growth forest destruction accounts for at least 18% of anthropocentric carbon release, results in mass extinction, threatens local ecosystems and livelihoods, and according to a soon to be published study may eventually result in biosphere collapse. [2] With Greenpeace and other “forest protection” NGO endorsement, primary and other old-growth forests continue to be unjustly, inequitably, and unsustainably deforested and diminished worldwide for products such as lawn furniture and toilet paper. [3] Forest NGOs have protested Greenpeace and other NGO involvement in FSC for over six years, yet been stonewalled and ridiculed, even as Earth's forest crisis deepens.

FSC is utterly dependent upon old-growth logging to meet market demand, with at least fifty percent of its products coming from industrial old-growth logging. Yet only about 10% of the old-growth timber trade is FSC-certified, and the other 90% makes competing ludicrous claims of environmental sustainability, which the public finds confusing. The ecological truth is that industrial-scale logging in tropical primary rainforests and other old-growth forests can never be ecologically and economically sustainable. Greenpeace’s secretive, undemocratic support for FSC greenwashes the entire, much larger old-growth timber market, making it virtually impossible to end such barbaric and ecocidal practices as cutting ancient sacred ecosystems. Anyone participating in the industrial destruction of Earth’s last old-growth forests – be they loggers, banks, governments, corporations, and especially NGOs – are legitimate protest targets, if standing old forests are to maintain local well-being and a habitable Earth for all.

Please demand that Greenpeace and pals end all involvement with primary rainforest and other old-growth logging, resign from FSC immediately, and work exclusively for old forest protection, restoration, and small-scale local eco-forestry. We have been asking Greenpeace politely to stop logging old-growth for the past six years, during which time many old forests have fallen and the fate of the biosphere become more unclear.


(privacy)

I do not wish to receive occasional short notifications of new action alerts (~3 a month)

In addition to new action alerts, inform me of major forest and climate policy developments (~2/month), and provide original environmental analysis (~2/month) (more information)


Your message is going to recipients. You may receive out of office or other emailed replies from protest email recipients.

Review and Edit Message

Greenpeace helps log old-growth forests
Greenpeace helps log old-growth forests  (link)

Message Title - please edit title and personalize message below (no URLs)

Your Message:


YOUR NAME, EMAIL & COUNTRY ADDED AUTOMATICALLY

bcc: YOU

" data-num-posts="4" data-width="470">
"

   Earth Action Network Protest Participants

    People from 92 countries have sent 533,933 protest emails

B Berkel - Germany
S Kranich - Estonia
J McDaniel - United States
B Israni - United States
M R Waller - United States
E S Hussey - United Kingdom
T V D Vorstenbosch - Poland
E Vieira - United States
L F G PhD - United States
A Balderston - United States
J Vandeputte - Belgium
A Parikh - United States
C K Raper - United States
L M Elliott - United States
W Mertens - Germany
W Ragar - United States
G Booth - Sweden
R Trochim - Poland
L Salazar - United States
M Cerkowski - United States
K Schliesmann - United States
R Harrington - United States
S Curran - United States
S Siivonen - Finland
A Rizzo - Italia
           



** This alert requires JavaScript. Please let us know immediately if you are having difficulties sending the alert